Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 144, 109227, July 2023

Investigation of the efficacy and adverse effects of lacosamide over 36 months

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Address: Jichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
    Kei Wakabayashi
    Footnotes
    1 Address: Jichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hitoshi Osaka
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Jichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hirokazu Yamagishi
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mari Kuwajima
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Takahiro Ikeda
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ayumi Matsumoto
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kazuhiro Muramatsu
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Takanori Yamagata
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Address: Jichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.

      Highlights

      • The response rate of LCM was 40.5% at 3 months, 40.5% at 6 months, 38.1% at 9 months, 35.7% at 12 months, 25.9% at 24 months, and 29.4% at 36 months.
      • The retention rate was 70.6% at 3 months, but then gradually declined to 34.8% at 36 months.
      • Our response rate was lower and our retention rate was higher in comparison to a previous study that observed patients over 36 months.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate the efficacy and retention rate of lacosamide (LCM) over 36 months as a treatment for children and adolescents with focal and generalized epilepsy based on a retrospective study.

      Methods

      All patients prescribed LCM as monotherapy and add-on therapy between October 2016 and September 2019 at Jichi Children’s Medical Center Tochigi were included in the study. The response rate, retention rate, and adverse effects were calculated.

      Results

      A total of 126 (female, n = 73) patients of 1.3 to 34.9 years old (median age: 12.8 years; mean ± SD 13.2 ± 6.6 years) received LCM as monotherapy or add-on treatment for focal, generalized, and combined focal and generalized epilepsy. The response rate was 40.5% at 3 months, 40.5% at 6 months, 38.1% at 9 months, 35.7% at 12 months, 25.9% at 24 months, and 29.4% at 36 months. For 34 patients who were observable for 36 months, the retention rate was 70.6% at 3 months, but then gradually declined to 34.8% at 36 months. According to the number of concomitant anti-seizure medications (ASMs), the retention rate was higher in patients receiving <3 ASMs than in those receiving ≥3 ASMs at all observation points. The most common adverse effects were somnolence in 21 patients (16.7%) and dizziness in 5 patients (39.7%).

      Conclusion

      Our response rate was lower and our retention rate was higher in comparison to a previous study that observed patients over 36 months. Further prospective studies in children are required to confirm the response rate and retention rate in patients treated with LCM over 36 months.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Epilepsy & Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Beyreuther B.
        • Callizot N.
        • Stohr T.
        Antinociceptive efficacy of lacosamide in the monosodium iodoacetate rat model for osteoarthritis pain.
        Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9: R14
        • Beyreuther B.K.
        • Freitag J.
        • Heers C.
        • Krebsfänger N.
        • Scharfenecker U.
        • Stöhr T.
        Lacosamide: a review of preclinical properties.
        CNS Drug Rev. 2007; 13: 21-42
        • McGinnis E.
        • Kessler S.K.
        Lacosamide use in children with epilepsy: Retention rate and effect of concomitant sodium channel blockers in a large cohort.
        Epilepsia. 2016; 57: 1416-1425
        • Rogawski M.A.
        • Tofighy A.
        • White H.S.
        • Matagne A.
        • Wolff C.
        Current understanding of the mechanism of action of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide.
        Epilepsy Res. 2015; 110: 189-205
        • Niespodziany I.
        • Leclere N.
        • Vandenplas C.
        • Foerch P.
        • Wolff C.
        Comparative study of lacosamide and classical sodium channel blocking antiepileptic drugs on sodium channel slow inactivation.
        J Neurosci Res. 2013; 91: 436-443
        • Rosati A.
        • Ilvento L.
        • Rizzi R.
        • Doccini V.
        • Leo M.C.
        • Pugi A.
        • et al.
        Long-term efficacy of add-on lacosamide treatment in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsies: A single-center observational study.
        Epilepsia. 2018; 59: 1004-1010
        • Fisher R.S.
        • Cross J.H.
        • D'Souza C.
        • French J.A.
        • Haut S.R.
        • Higurashi N.
        • et al.
        Instruction manual for the ILAE 2017 operational classification of seizure types.
        Epilepsia. 2017; 58: 531-542
        • Fisher R.S.
        • Cross J.H.
        • French J.A.
        • Higurashi N.
        • Hirsch E.
        • Jansen F.E.
        • et al.
        Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology.
        Epilepsia. 2017; 58: 522-530
        • Scheffer I.E.
        • Berkovic S.
        • Capovilla G.
        • Connolly M.B.
        • French J.
        • Guilhoto L.
        • et al.
        ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology.
        Epilepsia. 2017; 58: 512-521
        • Sanmartí-Vilaplana F.
        • Díaz-Gómez A.
        The effectiveness and safety of lacosamide in children with epilepsy in a clinical practice setting.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2018; 79: 130-137
        • Verrotti A.
        • Loiacono G.
        • Pizzolorusso A.
        • Parisi P.
        • Bruni O.
        • Luchetti A.
        • et al.
        Lacosamide in pediatric and adult patients: comparison of efficacy and safety.
        Seizure. 2013; 22: 210-216
        • Zhao T.
        • Li H.J.
        • Ma L.
        • Feng J.
        • Wang T.T.
        • Yu J.
        • et al.
        Safety, efficacy, and tolerability of lacosamide for the treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients in Uygur, China.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2021; 117107814
        • Böttcher S.
        • Lutz M.T.
        • Mayer T.
        Lacosamide in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities: A long-term study of 136 patients.
        Epilepsia. 2017; 58: 1749-1754
        • McGinty R.N.
        • Costello D.J.
        Long-term lacosamide retention-Real-world experience at a tertiary epilepsy center in Ireland.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2017; 68: 141-145
        • Fattore C.
        • Perucca E.
        Novel medications for epilepsy.
        Drugs. 2011; 71: 2151-2178
        • Hmaimess G.
        • Sabbagh S.
        • Dirani M.
        • Hotait M.
        • Beydoun A.A.
        • Nasreddine W.
        Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with lacosamide in children: Postmarketing experience from the Middle East.
        Seizure. 2020; 79: 75-79
        • Sake J.K.
        • Hebert D.
        • Isojärvi J.
        • Doty P.
        • De Backer M.
        • Davies K.
        • et al.
        A pooled analysis of lacosamide clinical trial data grouped by mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.
        CNS Drugs. 2010; 24: 1055-1068
        • Villanueva V.
        • López-Gomáriz E.
        • López-Trigo J.
        • Palau J.
        • García M.
        • Villarroya T.
        • et al.
        Rational polytherapy with lacosamide in clinical practice: results of a Spanish cohort analysis RELACOVA.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2012; 23: 298-304
        • Kim J.S.
        • Kim H.
        • Lim B.C.
        • Chae J.H.
        • Choi J.
        • Kim K.J.
        • et al.
        Lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsy.
        Brain Develop. 2014; 36: 510-515
        • Grosso S.
        • Parisi P.
        • Spalice A.
        • Verrotti A.
        • Balestri P.
        Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in infants and young children with refractory focal epilepsy.
        Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014; 18: 55-59
      1. Brenner J, Majoie HJM, van Beek S, Carpay JA. The retention of lacosamide in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability in three specialised institutions. Seizure 2017;52:123–130. Letter to the Editors.