Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 59, P117-121, June 2016

Download started.

Ok

Cortical processing during smartphone text messaging

      Highlights

      • Little is known about the effects of personal electronic devices on the brain.
      • Text messaging appears to produce a unique waveform during video-EEG monitoring.
      • Independent cognitive–sensorimotor tasks did not produce similar waveforms.
      • A multi-afferent network and mesial frontal efferent are active during texting.
      • The TR may have implications for industry and health care.

      Abstract

      Objective

      The objective of this study was to report the EEG features of text messaging using smartphones.

      Methods

      One hundred twenty-nine patients were prospectively evaluated during video-EEG monitoring (VEM) over 16 months. A reproducible texting rhythm (TR) present during active text messaging with a smartphone was compared with passive and forced audio telephone use, thumb/finger movements, cognitive testing/calculation, scanning eye movements, and speech/language tasks in patients with and without epilepsy. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

      Results

      Twenty-seven patients with a TR were identified from a cohort of 129 (93 female, mean age: 36; range: 18–71) unselected VEM patients. Fifty-three out of 129 patients had epileptic seizures (ES), 74/129 had nonepileptic seizures (NES), and 2/129 were dual-diagnosed. A reproducible TR was present in 27/129 (20.9%) specific to text messaging (p < 0.0001) and present in 28% of patients with ES and 16% of patients with NES (p = NS). The TR was absent during independent tasks and audio cellular telephone use (p < 0.0001). Age, gender, epilepsy type, MRI results, and EEG lateralization in patients with focal seizures were unrelated (p = NS).

      Conclusions

      Our results suggest that the TR on scalp EEG represents a novel technology-specific neurophysiological alteration of brain networks. We propose that cortical processing in the contemporary brain is uniquely activated by the use of PEDs.

      Significance

      These findings have practical implications that could impact industry and research in nonverbal communication.

      Abbreviations:

      cEEG (continuous EEG), ES (epileptic seizures), NES (nonepileptic seizures), PEDs (personal electronic devices), TR (texting rhythm), VEM (video-EEG monitoring)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Epilepsy & Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hirsch L.J.
        • Claassen J.
        • Mayer S.A.
        • Emerson R.G.
        Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill.
        Epilepsia. 2004; 45: 109-123
        • Tatum W.O.
        • Dworetzky B.A.
        • Freeman W.D.
        • Schomer D.L.
        Artifact: recording EEG in special care units.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 28: 264-277
        • Young B.
        • Osvath L.
        • Jones D.
        • Socha E.
        A novel EEG artifact in the intensive care unit.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 19: 484-486
        • Gaspard N.
        • Hirsch L.J.
        Pitfalls in ictal EEG interpretation: critical care and intracranial recordings.
        Neurology. 2013; 80: S26-S42
      1. Shannon V. 15 years of text messages, a ‘cultural phenomenon’. The New York Times-Technology 2007; http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/technology/05iht-sms.4.8603150.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed October 26, 2015.

        • Tatum W.O.
        • DiCiaccio B.
        • Kipta J.
        • Yelvington K.
        • Stein M.
        The texting rhythm: a novel EEG findings using smartphones.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; ([in press])https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000250
        • Tatum W.O.
        • Ly R.C.
        • Sluzewska-Niedzwiedz M.
        • Shih J.J.
        Lambda waves and occipital generators.
        Clin EEG Neurosci. 2013; 44: 307-312
        • Smith A.
        US Smartphone Use in 2015.
        ([Accessed October 6, 2015])
        • Runke M.A.
        • Markand O.N.
        Evoked theta hypersynchrony of adulthood.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2013; 124: 2063-2066
        • Tatum W.O.
        • Husain A.M.
        • Benbadis S.R.
        • Kaplan P.W.
        Normal adult EEG and patterns of uncertain significance.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 23: 194-207
        • Kubota Y.
        • Sato W.
        • Toichi M.
        • et al.
        Frontal midline theta rhythm is correlated with cardiac autonomic activities during the performance of an attention demanding meditation procedure.
        Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001; 11: 281-287
        • Koutroumanidis M.
        Euphoric (hedonic) theta hypersynchrony in early childhood.
        Epileptic Disord. 2006; 8: 299-304
        • Mizuki Y.
        Frontal lobe: mental function and EEG.
        Am J EEG Technol. 1987; 27: 91-101
        • Mizuki Y.
        • Tanaka M.
        • Isozaki H.
        • Nishijima H.
        • Inanaga K.
        Periodic appearance of theta rhythm in the frontal midline area during performance of a mental task.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980; 49: 345-351
        • Gibbs F.A.
        • Gibbs E.L.
        Atlas of electroencephalography.
        in: Normal controls. vol. 1. Addison-Wesley Press, Inc., Cambridge, MA1950
        • Takahashi N.
        • Shinomiya S.
        • Mori D.
        • Tachibana S.
        Frontal midline theta rhythm in young healthy adults.
        Clin Electroencephalogr. 1997; 28: 49-54
        • Thwaites A.
        • Nimmo-Smith I.
        • Fonteneau E.
        • Patterson R.D.
        • Buttery P.
        • Marslen-Wilson W.D.
        Tracking cortical entrainment in neural activity: auditory processes in human temporal cortex.
        Front Comput Neurosci. 2015; 9: 5
        • Ishii R.
        • Canuet L.
        • Ishihara T.
        • et al.
        Frontal midline theta rhythm and gamma power changes during focused attention on mental calculation: an MEG beamformer analysis.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 406
        • Kasamatsu A.
        • Hirai T.
        An electroencephalographic study on the zen meditation (Zazen).
        Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1966; 20: 315-336
        • Srinivasan R.
        • Russell D.P.
        • Edelman G.M.
        • Tononi G.
        Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception.
        J Neurosci. 1999; 19: 5435-5448
        • Niedermeyer E.
        • Krauss G.L.
        • Peyser C.E.
        The electroencephalogram and mental activation.
        Clin Electroencephalogr. 1989; 20: 215-227
        • Oberman L.
        • Edwards D.
        • Eldaief M.
        • Pascual-Leone A.
        Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 28: 67-74
        • Rugg M.D.
        • Dickens A.M.
        Dissociation of alpha and theta activity as a function of verbal and visuospatial tasks.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982; 53: 201-207
        • Zurek J., R.Shiemann Delgado
        • Froescher W.
        • Niedermeyer E.
        Frontal intermittent rhythmical delta activity and anterior bradyrthmia.
        Chin Electroencephalogr. 1985; 16: 1-10
        • Adey W.R.
        Hippocampal states and functional relations with corticosubcortical systems in attention and learning.
        Prog Brain Res. 1967; 27: 228-245
        • Nowak S.M.
        • Marczynski T.J.
        Trait anxiety is reflected in EEG alpha response to stress.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981; 52: 175-191
        • Ishihara T.
        • Yoshi N.
        Multivariate analytic study of EEG and mental activity in juvenile delinquents.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972; 33: 71-80
        • Vassalli A.
        • Dellepiane J.M.
        • Emmenegger Y.
        • et al.
        Electroencephalogram paroxysmal theta characterizes cataplexy in mice and children.
        Brain. 2013; 136: 1592-1608
        • Thomee S.
        • Harenstam A.
        • Hagberg M.
        Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults—a prospective cohort study.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 66
        • Asakawa T.
        • Muramatsu A.
        • Hayashi T.
        • Urata T.
        • Taya M.
        • Mizuno-Matsumoto Y.
        Comparison of EEG propagation speeds under emotional stimuli on smartphone between the different anxiety states.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 1006
        • Gindrat A.D.
        • Chytiris M.
        • Balerna M.
        • Rouiller E.M.
        • Ghosh A.
        Use-dependent cortical processing from fingertips in touchscreen phone users.
        Curr Biol. 2015; 25: 109-116
        • Smith C.C.
        • Tatum W.O.
        • Gupta V.
        • Pooley R.A.
        • Freeman W.D.
        SPECT-negative SIRPIDs: less aggressive neurointensive care?.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 31: e6-10
        • Steriade M.
        • Gloor P.
        • Llinas R.R.
        • Lopes de Silva F.H.
        • Mesulam M.M.
        Report of IFCN committee on basic mechanisms. Basic mechanisms of cerebral rhythmic activities.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990; 76: 481-508
        • Tran J.
        Texting while driving laws.
        ([Accessed October 26, 2015])
        • Federal Communications Commission
        The dangers of texting while driving.
        ([Accessed October 26, 2015])
        • Ding N.
        • Simon J.Z.
        Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.
        J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107: 78-89